<optgroup id="ewawa"><samp id="ewawa"></samp></optgroup>
<rt id="ewawa"><center id="ewawa"></center></rt>
<rt id="ewawa"><small id="ewawa"></small></rt>
<acronym id="ewawa"></acronym><sup id="ewawa"><center id="ewawa"></center></sup>
<acronym id="ewawa"></acronym>
<acronym id="ewawa"><center id="ewawa"></center></acronym>
<acronym id="ewawa"></acronym>

µ±Ç°Î»Ö㺠ϣÄá¶ûÊ×Ò³ > Ë«ÓïÐÂÎÅ



Æ»¹û¹«Ë¾³ÆiOS8¼°ÒÔÉϰ汾ϵͳÊý¾Ý²»»á±»ÌáÈ¡£¨ÖÐӢ˫Ó

ÇൺϣÄá¶û·­Òë×ÉѯÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾£¨www.joshualeeproperties.com£©ÕûÀí·¢²¼  2015-11-03

¡¡¡¡

ÇൺϣÄá¶û·­Ò빫˾£¨www.joshualeeproperties.com£©2015Äê11ÔÂ3ÈÕÁ˽⵽£ºÆ»¹û¹«Ë¾ÏòÃÀ¹ú·¨¹Ùղķ˹¡¤°ÂÂ×˹̹±íʾ£¬Ìáȡһ̨°²×°ÁËÆ»¹û×îвÙ×÷ϵͳ¡¢ÇÒÒѱ»Ëø¶¨µÄiPhoneÊÖ»úÉϵÄÊý¾ÝÊÇ¡°²»¿ÉÄܵġ±£¬µ«Æ»¹û¾ß±¸°ïÖúÖ´·¨»ú¹¹½âËø½Ï¾ÉiPhoneµÄ¡°¼¼ÊõÄÜÁ¦¡±¡£Apple Inc told a U.S. judge that accessing data stored on a locked iPhone would be "impossible" with devices using its latest operating system, but the company has the "technical ability" to help law enforcement unlock older phones.
Apple's position was laid out in a brief filed late Monday, after a federal magistrate judge in Brooklyn, New York, sought its input as he weighed a U.S. Justice Department request to force the company to help authorities access a seized iPhone during an investigation.
Æ»¹ûÔÚÖÜÒ»ÍíÌá½»µÄËßÊéÖгÂÊöÁËÉÏÊöÁ¢³¡¡£´ËǰÃÀ¹ú˾·¨²¿Ïò·¨ÔºÌá³öÒªÇ󯻹ûЭÖúµ±¾ÖÌáȡһ̨ÔÚµ÷²éÖнɻñµÄiPhoneÉϵÄÊý¾Ý£¬²¼Â³¿ËÁÖµÄÁª°îÖΰ²·¨¹Ù°ÂÂ×˹̹ÕýÔÚ¿¼Á¿¸ÃÒªÇ󣬲¢Ñ°Ç󯻹ûµÄÒâ¼û¡£
In court papers, Apple said that for the 90 percent of its devices running iOS 8 or higher, granting the Justice Department's request "would be impossible to perform" after it strengthened encryption methods.
ÔÚ·¨Í¥ÎļþÖУ¬Æ»¹û³Æ£¬ÔÚÆ»¹ûÇ¿»¯¼ÓÃÜ·½·¨ºó£¬¶ÔÓÚ90%ÔËÐÐiOS 8»òÒÔÉϰ汾µÄÆ»¹ûÉ豸£¬ÃÀ¹ú˾·¨²¿µÄÒªÇóÊÇ¡°ÎÞ·¨±»Ö´Ðеġ±¡£
Æ»¹û¹«Ë¾³ÆiOS 8¼°ÒÔÉϰ汾ϵͳÊý¾Ý²»»á±»ÌáÈ¡

Those devices include a feature that prevents anyone without the device's passcode from accessing its data, including Apple itself.

ÕâЩÉ豸¾ß±¸Ò»¸öÌØÐÔ£¬¿ÉÒÔ·ÀֹûÓÐÃÜÂëµÄÈκÎÒ»·½»ñÈ¡¸ÃÉ豸µÄÊý¾Ý£¬°üÀ¨Æ»¹û¹«Ë¾Ò²²»ÐС£
Apple told U.S. Magistrate Judge James Orenstein it could access the 10 percent of its devices that continue to use older systems, including the one at issue in the case. But it urged the judge to not require it to comply with the Justice Department's request.
Æ»¹ûÏò°ÂÂ×˹̹±íʾ£¬Æ»¹û¿ÉÒÔÌáÈ¡ÈÔÔÚʹÓýϾɰ汾²Ù×÷ϵͳµÄÄÇ10%µÄÆ»¹ûÉ豸£¬°üÀ¨ÉÏÊö°¸¼þÖеÄiPhoneÊÖ»ú¡£µ«Æ»¹û¶Ø´Ù°ÂÂ×˹̹ÎðÒªÇ󯻹û°´ÕÕÃÀ¹ú˾·¨²¿µÄÒªÇóÐÐÊ¡£
"Forcing Apple to extract data in this case, absent clear legal authority to do so, could threaten the trust between Apple and its customers and substantially tarnish the Apple brand," Apple's lawyers wrote.
¡°ÔÚȱ·¦Ã÷È··¨ÂÉÐí¿ÉµÄÇé¿öÏ£¬ÔÚ±¾°¸ÖÐÆÈʹƻ¹ûÌáÈ¡Êý¾Ý£¬¿ÉÄÜÍþвƻ¹ûÓëÆä¿Í»§Ö®¼äµÄÐÅÈΣ¬²¢¼«´óËðº¦Æ»¹ûÆ·ÅÆ£¬¡±Æ»¹ûµÄÂÉʦдµÀ¡£
A spokeswoman for Brooklyn U.S. Attorney Robert Capers, whose office is handling the case, declined comment.
ÃÀ¹ú²¼Â³¿ËÁÖÁª°î¼ì²ì¹ÙÂÞ²®ÌØ¡¤¿­ÆÕ˹µÄ°ì¹«ÊÒ¸ºÔð´Ë°¸£¬¿­ÆÕ˹µÄ·¢ÑÔÈ˾ܾø¾Í´ËÖÃÆÀ¡£


×¢£º²¿·ÖÐÂÎÅÀ´Ô´ÓÚÍøÂ·£¬ÈçÓÐÉæ¼°°æÈ¨£¬Ç뼰ʱ֪ͨÎÒÃÇ£¬ÎÒÃǽ«¾¡¿ìɾ³ý¡£

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Çൺ·­Ò빫˾  ¼ÝÕÕ·­Òë  Ñ§ÀúÈÏÖ¤·­Òë